Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request

[Aaron Bentley]

Robert Anderson wrote:
> While not pretty it is better than what I actually did.
>
> It also seems to be a nice implementation for a civilized
> interface to the functionality.

Yeah, it does seem pretty simple to generalize.

> Re revlibs.  Just blow it all away and start over?

Well, you could just delete it from your library list, and start a new 
library.  If it turns out the problem was elsewhere, you could restore 
it later.

>  I guess I'll
> take a long lunch today.

The builder changes in my integration branch speed up revision building 
by skipping unnecessary inode-sig generation, if that's any help.

address@hidden/tlasrc--integration--1.3

Aaron

--
Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.