Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree shows no revisions in version

[Ron Arts]

Yes, 'tla logs -f' printed nothing at all.
It turns out I copied the archive from another user, I had forgotten all
about that, and the original changelog tree still had the original name.

Thanks a lot for the help. 
One step further for arch to replace CVS in our company  ;-)

Ron

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:16:09 +0200, Jan Hudec <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 13:30:01 +0200, Ron Arts wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What does 'what-changed: tree shows no revisions in version' mean?
> > I mean, I freshly retrieved the tree with tla get, and I *did* modify 
> > something
> >
> > Here's what I did:
> > $ tla abrowse upwatch
> > address@hidden
> >   upwatch
> >     upwatch--mainline
> >       upwatch--mainline--0.97
> >         base-0 .. patch-5
> > $ tla get upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-5 upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-5
> > * from import revision:
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--base-0
> > * patching for revision:
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-1
> > * patching for revision:
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-2
> > * patching for revision:
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-3
> > * patching for revision:
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-4
> > * patching for revision:
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-5
> > * making pristine copy
> > * tree version set address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97
> > $ cd upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-5
> > $ <edit some file>
> > $ tla what-changed
> > what-changed: tree shows no revisions in version
> > tree: /home/uwrelman/current/build/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-5
> > version: address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97
> > $ tla tree-version
> > address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97
> >
> > Now I look at it, indeed it does not show revisions, but why not?
> > I *did* specify a revision with tla get
> 
> IIRC the bug means "I can't find the changelogs". The changelogs live in
> directory:
> {arch}/upwatch/upwatch--mainline/upwatch--mainline--0.97/address@hidden/patch-log/
> in the working directory and should be named base-0, patch-1 ...
> patch-5.
> 
> As a sanity check, look if those files exist and are readable by tla.
> 
> You should also try the command:
> tla logs -f
> and it should print:
> address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--base-0
> address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-1
> address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-2
> address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-3
> address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-4
> address@hidden/upwatch--mainline--0.97--patch-5
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                  Jan 'Bulb' Hudec 
> <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> 
> signature.asc - 1K
>