Re: [Gnu-arch-users] c--b--v/base-0

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 13:29, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Zenaan Harkness <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > When would one see a base-n patch, other than base-0 ?
> 
> Never.

So, would it make sense to shorten it to just base?

base-0 implies to me something that, by the sound of it is not the case.

Newbie perspective of course - there may be some other reason that the
existing name is more sensible, or silly to change or whatever.

ta
zen