[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:10:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 12:11:09PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> Now, syntax: Basically, "Oh, come on. do you really think we can't
> get around to making really nice syntaxes even if initially we use
> crude ones? That's half the point of getting serious about the "type
> system" we use where libawk is now: so that these files don't become
> syntax bound --- so that we have the flexibility to make incremental
> changes to improve syntaxes in compatible, disciplined ways. Geeze."
I still intend to see that whatever I have to deal with gets boosted
up to Haskell's level. I expect it'll be fairly easy; demote
parentheses to pure precedence (an LR(1) parser doesn't need them in
almost every case), add the infix transform and the layout rule, and
you're most of the way there.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Daniel Stone, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Charles Duffy, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Daniel Stone, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Daniel Stone, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the state of the union, Stefan Monnier, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Miles Bader, 2004/08/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union,
Andrew Suffield <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Robin Green, 2004/08/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Darcs data model [was: the state of the union], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Darcs data model, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Darcs data model [was: the state of the union], Tom Lord, 2004/08/30