Re: [Gnu-arch-users] We should rename arch to "jla"

[Yann Droneaud]

address@hidden (James Blackwell) writes:

> I lied. Sorry. But now that I've got your attention.....
>
> Have *you* tried 1.2.2rc1 yet? I've received only one email so far
> reporting on 1.2.2rc1 behavior. I need for there to be a lot more
> testing.
>
> Sure, I'm most interested in failures, but I'm more than happy to get
> reports of success too. Nothing puts a skip in my step quite like "I tried
> the release candidate for a couple hours, and while I didn't do anything
> complicated, it did seem to work for me".
>
> I tell you what. I'll send $10 to the first person that finds a bug in the
> most recent release candidate that is not present in the most recent
> release of arch.
>

I'm using 1.2.2rc1 + my last merge requests, and I see no bugs 
(but I don't have an advanced use of tla: I use only basic command get,
import, commit, replay, archive-mirror). 

So, It works for me.

Regards.

-- 
Yann Droneaud (aka Meuh) <address@hidden>
http://meuh.org/ | http://sherkan.tuxfamily.net/~meuh/
Une vache perdue sur Internet | A cow lost in the Internet
1024D/BEA43321   5D91 B5B0 5137 B8FE 6882  FE19 CAA0 6F05 BEA4 3321