[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help"
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help" |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:42:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:38:16PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> It's a bit off the immediate topic, but two things that played a
> strong part in _my_ switch to arch were slightly different:
>
> 3) simplicity
>
> 4) robustness
I agree here. I was drawn to arch because it could manage all the non-
source metadata I needed, like symlinks and (automatic) binaries, all
using time-honoured tools like tar and patch.
Of course, branching/merging and changesets made it a cake
smothered in icing.
I hope the attempts to simplify the help system will bring out point
number 3, which is likely lost on anyone who tries to get acquainted
using 'tla help'.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", Esben Mose Hansen, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", John Meinel, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", Esben Mose Hansen, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help", Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help", John S. Yates, Jr., 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help", Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help", Matthew Palmer, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help", Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "Newbie-ized help",
Adrian Irving-Beer <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", Stig Brautaset, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", Dustin Sallings, 2004/09/27
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", Matthew Dempsky, 2004/09/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "Newbie-ized help", Miles Bader, 2004/09/26