Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft)

[Andrew Suffield]

On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 04:13:17PM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> The question of how the voting system and group-maintained acceptance
> process fits in is interesting and I didn't write about that, but I
> think it is reasonably solvable.

As best I can determine: it doesn't. It's entirely independent. Only
the bug database itself is connected here; a vote-driven branch should
be regarded merely as a convinient source from which you can construct
the branches you described (convinience being inversely proportional
to the amount of stuff that passes without going through the
vote-driven branch, and that's intrinsic to the problem). It doesn't
actually appear anywhere in the stuff you covered.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature