[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit
From: |
Anand Kumria |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:20:27 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) |
So I was helping my second to last user at my work switch over to tla
today. They did the classic:
tla archive-setup
tla init-tree
tla add...
tla import -s "..." [1]
tla commit -s "initial import"
Which I notice I've done pretty regularly on my own archives. Is there any
reason for the difference between import and commit? Why does commit allow
you to commit if no changes have occurred?
Regards,
Anand
[1]: tla import having -S and -s is a bad idea; perhaps -C,
--create-archive would be less likely to confuse. I've typed in '-S' more
than once.
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit,
Anand Kumria <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, John S. Yates, Jr., 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14