gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions


From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: File naming conventions
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:35:11 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 09:17:14AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If the other discussions that have strongly suggested the user-visible
> portions inside {arch} are being removed (tla 2.0?) with {arch} simply
> becoming an arch system-level database, is there any reason it couldn't
> be renamed .{arch} or similar?

What on earth would the point be?  The only complaints that don't fall into
the category of "it's just not to my taste" are ones that have to do with
typing that name in csh/tcsh, and if people don't need to type it, those
complaints go away.

[Anyway, I don't want {arch} to go away at all, because it's a convenient
place to put my own arch-related meta-files.]

-Miles
-- 
Saa, shall we dance?  (from a dance-class advertisement)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]