[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a second branch
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a second branch |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:47:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 04:28:59PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> OK, I have a simple setup:
>
> stable
> / \
> developer1 developer2
...
> Now, I have a change that will take me a good week or may be three, and
> I want to develop this in a new branch, so I can make bug fixes in my
> regular branch.
...
> Should I tag off of developer1 (my dev branch) or tag another branch off
> of stable?
I'd tag off stable.
> If the former, then do I just star-merge the changes once completed into
> stable, or into my developer1 branch and then into stable?
If you tag from your branch then you should probably star-merge into
your branch before merging into stable. Or, you could use star-merge
with the --reference option.
> If none of it matters, are there any consequences to the alternatives?
Basically, pick where/how you want to resolve potential conflicts...
Stig