Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: library-add w/o ancestor checking?

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 16:46 -0600, John A Meinel wrote:

> One thing I would say, is that probably 'tla tag' should be called 'tla 
> branch' since that is closer to what it is doing, and prevents confusion 
> from cvs users.
> 
> Maybe leave in tag, but it can only be used to create tag-only branches, 
> versus 'branch' which can only be used to create base-0 versions.

I think that that distinction is artificial, needlessly limiting, and
would add confusion + frustration. 

> The only problem is how do you tell if base-0 was created with tag or 
> branch?
>
> Maybe this is more for something like baz.

We've got a mockup page for the UI, something to sketch out ideas on. 

http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/BazaarMockupUI

As it happens, 'branch' is there already, to create branches [versions
really].

Rob

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part