[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
Mark Stosberg |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 01:31:08 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.0 (FreeBSD) |
On 2004-11-08, Catalin Marinas <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> A second problem I think is Haskell. Not so many people can help with
> coding and it is also much slower than C or C++.
Other people have already addressed the "slower than C" issue. I'll
address the "not so many people can help..." issue.
Recall that Arch became popular with despite being written in shell. :)
Users don't care so much about the implementation language. They care
about the features and documentation, because that's what they see. If
darcs became sufficiently popular because it functions well, it's
possible that like darcs, someone would re-implement it in another
language.
I'm a Perl programmer who contributes to darcs, and I don't see that
Haskell is a big issue holding back contributions. What I see instead
is how much work in a successful project is /not/ coding. As a
non-Haskell programmer, I can:
- Help with the direction of the software through bug reports and
feature suggestions.
- Contribute documentation patches
- Contribute test cases, written in shell or Perl.
- Help answer questions on the -users list
- Work on the website, other forms of advocacy.
- Work on the CVS and Arch conversion tools, or the repo browser, which
are all written in Perl.
I was reading today how on large software projects, coding can be 15% of
the effort:
http://www.ifpug.com/Articles/estimating.htm
I think with open source projects, a similar effect happens: The
more the project grows, the more different kinds of contributions are needed
to make it work. For example, you might add translators, or people to
port the application to other platforms.
BTW, Darcs 1.0 was released today!
I should mention after a stint of being an arch user for a bit, I have
converted all my arch managed projects over to darcs. I'm a convert.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Karel Gardas, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Florian Weimer, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Bruce Stephens, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Robert Collins, 2004/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Miles Bader, 2004/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Cameron Patrick, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Safer star-merge (was Re: darcs vs tla), Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/15
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
Mark Stosberg <=
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John Goerzen, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Jani Monoses, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John Goerzen, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, John A Meinel, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Dustin Sallings, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/12