Re: [Gnu-arch-users] conflict applying patch in arch_build_revision

[Masatake YAMATO]

To make people can inspect my PANIC easily, I have made
.tar.gz file of the archive. 
(Categories other than gtracer are removed.)

            wget http://www.gyve.org/~jet/inspector.tar.gz

I wrote:
> When I tried to get my code from my archive, I got a PANIC.
> 
> 
>     address@hidden jet]$ tla get address@hidden/gtracer--mainline--0.0 
> /tmp/examples
>     * from pristine cache: address@hidden/gtracer--mainline--0.0--base-0
>     * patching for revision: address@hidden/gtracer--mainline--0.0--patch-1
>     PANIC: conflict applying patch in arch_build_revision
>     address@hidden jet]$ tla --version
>     tla 
> address@hidden/dists--devo--1.0--patch-9(configs/emf.net-tla/devo.tla-1.2) 
> from regexps.com
> 
>     Copyright 2003 Tom Lord
> 
>     This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
>     There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>     PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> 
>     Report bugs to address@hidden
> 
>     # automatically generated release id (by tla build-config)
>     #
> 
>     address@hidden/dists--devo--1.0--patch-9(configs/emf.net-tla/devo.tla-1.2)
> 
>     ./src     address@hidden/package-framework--devo--1.0--patch-3
>     ./src/docs-hackerlab      address@hidden/docs-hackerlab--devo--1.0--base-0
>     ./src/docs-tla    address@hidden/docs-tla--devo--1.0--patch-5
>     ./src/hackerlab   address@hidden/hackerlab--devo--1.0--patch-37
>     ./src/tla address@hidden/tla--devo--1.2--patch-115
> 
>     address@hidden jet]$ 
> 
> I used google to know more about this PANIC; and I found
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-arch-users/2004-02/msg00243.html
> 
> > Ok, Aaron Bentley and I have verified that there was a missing corner
> > case check in pristine tree verification. I'd wager you did something
> > that resulted in partial deletion of the pristine tree, including the
> > patch logs dir. This results in an incorrect add in the subsequent
> > commit.
> > 
> > The fixed code is in
> > address@hidden/tla--integration--1.2--patch-8
> > 
> > And will be in tom's branch soon I hope.
> 
> Here are my questions:
> 
>      1. Is the patch(address@hidden/tla--integration--1.2--patch-8)
>         is merged to Tom's tree?
> 
>      2. If the patch is merged to Tom's tree, how can I know the revision?
> 
>      3. The bug fix is done for whether `tla commit' related code or
>         `tla get' related code?
>       If `tla commit' related code, even if I replaced tla installed to
>       my GNU system with newer one, the situation will change; the archive
>       is already broken. If `tla get' related code, I can continue to use
>       my archive.
>         
> Regards,
> Masatake YAMATO