Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: trained dependency

[Thomas Lord]

    > From: Andrew Suffield <address@hidden>

    > > Your fetishsizing of "original thoughts" is also problematic.   We've
    > > known that interesting original thoughts can be systematically and
    > > reliably cranked out, nearly assembly-line fashion, since Fluxus and
    > > Eno, at least.

    > Infinite monkeys do not count :P

What does that mean, in this context?  I recognize it (":P") as
flippant but when I try to map it onto a more detailed joke -- that
fails.


    > Besides, my point stands as stated. Most people *don't*.

I'm afraid that your point stands as incoherent, not true.

-t