[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions

From: Dimitrie O. Paun
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Archives vs. categories vs. versions
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:15:09 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:09:10PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> John A Meinel <address@hidden> writes:
> Hmmm, my emacs branch just hit 700 revisions (in this archive), and I
> have no obvious problems in daily usage -- and I access it remotely over
> a slow link!  However the "tag" command does seem to have some
> bogosities with many revisions.

What bogosities? :)

> Anyway, even if this is a problem, I think bumping the version is pretty
> much equivalent to changing your archive in this respect

That would be cool. If this is the case (are you sure?), then the
year-in-the-arvhice-name technique is needed only for the cases
where you have a lot of patches in a given version. Right?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]