[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla

From: Karel Gardas
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:03:26 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Jan Hudec wrote:

> > - darcs does not support patch signing/verification except simple
> >   email-based transport method (showstopper for me)
> Arch does not support signing/verification for transport -- it supports
> it for STORAGE. That's the key point. The signatures are stored and can
> be validated at any point in future. Eg. after a security accident.

Yes, true, sorry for not so precise definition. The most important thing
is that signing/verification is transport independend while this is not
the case in darcs. In addition darcs patches are not signed in repository
but on export (by send command), which is showstopper about which I wrote.

Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd. 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]