[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin

From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:38:28 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:25:22PM -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2004, at 16:06, Tom Browder wrote:
> >Does arch offer or plan to offer those three features (CVS rtag 
> >equivalent,
> >binary diff, CVSROOT equivalent)?
>       There has been discussion of binary diffs a while back, but I don't 
> remember quite what came out of it.

Arch already has the only kind of binary diff that is possible.

It would be possible to compress the changesets better but there is
little demand for this, to the point where nobody cares enough to do

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]