[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin

From: Adrian Irving-Beer
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Versus CVS Versus Subversoin
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:54:27 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:03:33AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:

[. . .]
> Things in this set will also inevitably recur (since they don't get
> implemented but people still want to talk about them), so these
> things will be the *most* talked about on mailing lists. Therefore
> the above will be the most common response to people talking about
> missing features.

Good point.  For example, maybe I wasn't reading closely enough, but I
didn't hear about i18n at *all* until someone sent a few 'it's done,
code review and translators please' posts.

Yet I hear about binary diff regularly, along with other
recurring themes.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]