Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla 1.4

[Milan Cvetkovic]

Jan Hudec wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:03:33 -0500, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
>
> > Jan Hudec wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:05:55 -0800, Andy Tai wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Using savannah would be good, or maybe baz's bug
> > > > tracker can also be shared with tla?  In any case,
> > > > both are better than having no bug tracker at all.  
> > > > Arch is in competition with Subversion, and having no
> > > > bug tracker does not look good...
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe the original objection against savannah's bug tracker was,
> > > that it does not accept emails. AFAIK bugzilla does not either, so
> > > that would not win anything.
> >
> > You can set up bugzilla to accept emails. I am not sure if baz bugzilla 
> > is set up that way, but it is doable.
>
>
> And is it doable to set bugzilla to be fully controlled by mails?
> Closing bugs, assigning bugs and such?

I know that you can open bugs, and update them using email. This is what 
we use. Bugs are created automatically by a daemon process, and then our 
 {arch}/=hook sends an email to update the bug in bugzilla, when we 
commit with tla.

I am not sure if you can close bugs, or change theri state using email 
interface, but I would guess it is possible, you just have to read the 
perl script - and maybe tweak it a little.

It came with bugzilla in "contrib" directory.

Milan.