[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit
From: |
Ulf Ochsenfahrt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:42:31 +0100 |
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 16:56 +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Deliverable Mail <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > "the idiot has just run me twice, well that's life, just go on and
> > do it, there's no reason in dissuading him anyhow"...:)
>
> What tla says about your second commit is more: "The intelligent guy!
> he noticed that he could add a log entry without making any change by
> running tla commit twice. Let's obey!".
>
> In practice, I'm not sure anyone other than Tom use this "feature",
> but that's life.
I do. Regularly. I sometimes mess up the log message of the previous
commit and then just commit another log message. But maybe that's
because I'm special. ;) I even thought about moving the repository to a
write-once storage medium.
Cheers,
-- Ulf
> There have been some discussions about adding a --no-empty-commit or
> whatever to tla, that could be enabled by default by wrappers, but I
> think no one bothered to implement it up to now.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Catalin Marinas, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Miles Bader, 2005/03/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Catalin Marinas, 2005/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Mark A. Flacy, 2005/03/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit,
Ulf Ochsenfahrt <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/03/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22