Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Problem with star-merge

[John A Meinel]

Ingo Buescher wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:38:36AM +0200, Ingo Buescher said
> >
> >
> > > So the question is: is it possible at all with tla to have merges in
> > > form of a net, where everybody can
> > > merge from everybody and tla is smart enough to figure out, which
> > > patches are already applied
> > > (because of information in the wiki I thought this was possible) or does
> > > tla needs a tree like
> > > structure with one central developer, where everybody merges from and to?
> > >
> > > And if  it is possible to use tla in form of a net, any idea, what might
> > > have gone wrong?
> >
> > As someone else explained, star-merge can't handle this situation; 'baz
> > merge' can handle more complicated mesh arrangments, though, perhaps
> > it's worth a try?
> >
> > -rob
> I'd like to give baz a try, but since we are using windows as our main
> developer plattform I have to wait until a win32 version is available -
> so far I was using the native win32 port of tla (version 1.3) and have
> switched
> to the cygwin version of tla-1.3.1 today.
>
> Ingo Buescher

Well, once I can get gpgme to compile for cygwin, I'll probably get a
version of baz for cygwin. I'm not sure why it is being such a pain, but
I'm working on it.

So it should be soon, as in only a few weeks.

John
=:->

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature