[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?
From: |
Jérôme Marant |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 May 2005 23:56:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Widhopf-Fenk <address@hidden> writes:
>> Sorry for the very late reply, but I've been trying to reproduce the
>> problem without any success.
>
> Well I can, and there seem to be two problems, the last few
> times I merged on those two trees baz was working without any
> problems and I did not change anything except doing "baz
> upgrade" and adding some signing rules.
Thank you very much, Robert! I'm sure it will help fixing
the problem.
> Unfortunately tla now does not find the archives anymore due
> to baz upgrade ;-/, I need to reregister them.
Same problem here, I think it is a lack of backward compatibility.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
- [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Collins, 2005/05/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?,
Jérôme Marant <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 2005/05/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [Bazaar] Has #385 been fixed in upcoming 1.4?, Jérôme Marant, 2005/05/20