[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status

[Miles Bader]

Adrian Irving-Beer <address@hidden> writes:
>> Doesn't baz support "changes" anyway?
>
> Just a deprecated alias for 'status'.

That's kind of stupid -- they do different things.  Changes gives a list
of changes in a concise and easily parsed standard format; the last time
I tried it, "baz status" had other random crap tacked on as well (and
mucked up the standard part a bit too for no apparent reason).

-Miles
-- 
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
  --Albert Einstein