[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?

From: jblack
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:13:01 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:34:11PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:45:46PM +0200, Matthieu MOY wrote:
> >> martin f krafft said:
> >> 
> >> > Another thing I am completely missing from baz is better/more
> >> > flexibly/scalable hook support.
> >> 
> >> That's very hard to do in a secure way: baz hooks are arbitrary code, and
> >> have to be ran on the client since there's no real server. And I don't
> >> want arbitrary code to be executed on my machine when I run baz ...
> >
> > Not to pick nits, but hooks aren't arbitrary code. They're code that
> > traditionally the user himself has written. 
> Hooks in the way Bazaar manages them (~/.arch-params/hook), yes. But
> Martin was asking for a hook managed in the archive itself. In this
> case, you can't trust the code by default (the wiki desribes a way to
> store the hook in the working tree, actually).

/me feels his jaw drop in shock

Martin, tell me it's not so?

 James Blackwell      |   Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed
 Tell someone a joke! |   you yet.                       - yours truly
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]