Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: The future of GNU Arch users

[jblack]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:58:36PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> 
> However, tla was the GNU implementation of Arch.  Since it is no longer
> maintained and Bazaar 1.x is regarded as its continuation, then maybe
> Bazaar 1.x should officially become part of the GNU Project and be
> referred to as the only maintained Arch (1.x) implementation?

You may not know this, but the next major bazaar is actively being worked
on (you can research it at http://bazaar-ng.org). This would lead to a
rather awkward situation.

The day may come in which the community needs to have a serious discussion
about whether or not to turn bazaar into a gnu project. Today, though, its
probably a bit premature.

> Admittedly, that wouldn't make any difference technically.  But it would
> bind an actively developed and used implementation to the name "GNU
> Arch".


> 
> Thanks,
> Ludovic.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/

-- 
 James Blackwell      |   Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed
 Tell someone a joke! |   you yet.                       - yours truly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400