[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 02:02:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.10i |
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:19:52AM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:14:17PM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> > Arch was forked because I declined an offer for employment from
> > Canonical because I found the details of the offer to be
> > obnoxious.
>
>
> Asuffield:
> > I'm rather curious about those details.
>
> Over a pint someday.
Impractical; I neither drink alcohol nor enter US territory :P
> That I didn't accept, even given my
> financial status at the time, should give you a sense.
Sure, but I'm more interested in exactly what game they think they're
playing. I know what they're *doing*, but it's hard to identify why
they're doing it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation, Thomas Lord, 2005/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation, Thomas Lord, 2005/09/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] details is details, not punctuation, Thomas Lord, 2005/09/08