[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners...

From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Maintainership, and whiners...
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 03:07:39 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:43:38PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> There seems to me to be enough interesting work in darcs, codeville,
> monotone, and (maybe) mercurial.  Maybe svk, too.

Exactly what I said. Gross duplication of work and yet not *one* of
them is vaguely feature complete. No less than six different groups,
and probably more, have implemented the same thing and done it
differently badly every time. That indicates something is very broken

> I think it's
> reasonable to assume that subversion has won the centralised RC race,

I see people saying this several times a week, for subversion, cvs,
rcs, tar, webdav, MS source safe, cmvc, perforce, and probably some
more that I've forgotten.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]