[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a new maintainer and corruption of the volunteer sy
From: |
Rene Schallner |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a new maintainer and corruption of the volunteer system |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:17:19 +0200 |
On Oct 28, 2005, at 02:34 , Thomas Lord wrote:
So, without wishing to reopen the issue, as you know
I find that the volunteer system is too vulnerable to
corruption.
Correct. I also don't want to reopen the issue... but:
If GNU Arch 1.x were to find a new maintainer, that
maintainer and volunteers who helped him would have
an advantage: Canonical has, at least, helped the
project develop a kind of immune-system response
to certain kinds of abuse.
In my opinion, they have done more than that recently. I think that
their abandonment of baz works in tla's favour :-). Especially now,
with a new maintainer, it shows once again: there's only one true GNU
Arch that people can rely on: The original!
Volunteerism is not per se bad and I hope people
would help a new maintainer.