|
From: | Thomas Lord |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? |
Date: | Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:56:19 -0700 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) |
James Blakwell wrote: > [....] Let me slightly break my own rule about early replies to say: (a) This is good. Thanks. (b) Will you consider specifying a more specific target market? That question on the form was inspired by *your* reports of negative experience getting projects to switch. Certainly speed is one issue, but isn't the fact that many projects are already heavily "invested" in CVS also an issue making SVN (if anything) a more natural choice? Of course we might want *everyone* to eventually use Arch but do you think there are some specific types of projects that make more sense than others to target initially? The more specific the target market, the better a job we can do focusing efforts (e.g., deciding what kind of documentation is a higher priority).As for "isn't Andy in charge?" ... Of some things, yes. I don't see how
that is relevant to this thread, though. -t James Blackwell wrote:
1. Target Market?Software developers - Primary Sysadmins - Secondary2. Target Market Needs?Speed. - Too slow, no adoption Simplicity - Complex UI, slow adoption Portability. - No Windows - wait ten years to start.No Mac OS X - wait twenty years to start.3. "Business" Model?- Scratch your own itch - Can't scratch your own? Pay someone elseI'm a little confused. Isn't Andy in charge?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |