[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+

From: Andy Tai
Subject: Fwd: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:04:42 -0800

For now you should treat Arch (tla) as GPL v2 only.  The FSF is in the process of getting copyright assignment from a copyright holder of some code in Arch; once that is complete I have the permissions of all the copyright holders and then the next release will switch to GPL v3 or later.

Thank you for getting tla updated in Fedora.

On Nov 10, 2007 11:57 AM, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray < address@hidden> wrote:
Is GNU Arch (ie. tla-1.3.5) licensed under "GPL version 2 only" or
"GPL version 2 or (at your option) any later version" ? The Savannah
project page ( mentions "GNU
General Public License v2 or later", while the src/COPYING file in the
1.3.5 release tarball mentions "...GNU General Public License, version

This piece of information is essential for creating a tla Fedora package.

Happy hacking.
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server:

Andy Tai, address@hidden

Andy Tai, address@hidden
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]