[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] potentially tained/non-free software
From: |
Michał Masłowski |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] potentially tained/non-free software |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:08:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> batik_1.7 has a non-free file
> https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34579
> -> I'm not sure if its sane to repack a .jar, I'll need to investigate
> more.
The jar is built from fop. I don't know Debian/gNewSense policy on
this, in my opinion it should depend on a separate package with fop's
jars.
> bacula has a freedom problem
> https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34578
> - could i get some input on this bug please? Does anyone else agree
> with jasons interpretation of the licence? if its generally agreed to
> be a problem i'll report a bug in debian. This appears to be the same
> as https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=34424 ,
> so the answer would be good there too :)
I don't see a difference between making derived works or modifying, so I
agree.
(I've blacklisted all of these packages (including fop) in Parabola,
except for beav which I couldn't find there.)
pgpnT5ZS9H2Vg.pgp
Description: PGP signature