[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Discussing the FSF endorsement process going forwa
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Discussing the FSF endorsement process going forward |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2018 01:49:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
i dont think speed or efficiency was ever a problem or even an objective
- regardless of who was "active" or "pro-active" whatever that means :)
the key thing that was elucidated in this announcement is that there was
little transparency - regardless of what was happening or not happening,
either on this list or behind closed doors, there was no definitive
order to the process; so no one knew which distros were even to be
considered, nor when, nor what progress was made or consensus reached
regarding any - and the distros themselves were unclear on how to
initiate the process
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Discussing the FSF endorsement process going forward, Jason Self, 2018/02/27
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Discussing the FSF endorsement process going forward, bill-auger, 2018/02/28
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Discussing the FSF endorsement process going forward, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2018/02/28