[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thu, 04 Jul 2002 04:32:21 -0500
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020703
I quote from a Mandrake spec for DotGNU Portable .NET:
Summary: A portable interpreter for .NET plateform binaries
Buildrequires: treecc >= 0.1.0
The primary goal of this project is to build a stable and portable
interpreter for .NET platform binaries, together with a suite of open
source tools to build .NET applications. The initial target platform
is Linux, with other platforms to follow in the future.
Now, since pnet is a GNU project, *and* Southern Storm says `free
software' not `open source', would it be appropriate to tell the spec
writers to change that annoying `bug'?
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://www.dotgnu.org
It read like a socialist polemic, but I saw something different. I
saw a business plan in disguise.
-- Michael Tiemann, co-founder of Cygnus Support, on the
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- packaging `open-source',