[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defensive publishing for medical ideas?
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: defensive publishing for medical ideas? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 17:49:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X) |
In article <877jvkpasa.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>,
John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> Barry Margolin writes:
> > But that might result in the patent being granted because the examiner
> > didn't check all the obscure journals. You might still be able to get
> > the patent rejected during a reexamination by referring them to the
> > obscure journal, but that's more work.
>
> And you might not, and for good reason. Publication needs to be somewhere
> such that the article is likely to be seen by a diligent practitioner of
> the art. Otherwise you could protect trade secrets from being
> independently invented and patented by publishing them in a classified ad
> in a local village newspaper in Outer Slobovia.
The previous poster was merely suggesting less restrictive journals, not
locations totally unrelated to the subject industry.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
Re: defensive publishing for medical ideas?, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/10
Re: defensive publishing for medical ideas?, Joern Rennecke, 2004/05/10