[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code
From: |
Paul Jarc |
Subject: |
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:51:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> His concern is that this copyright notice is not required to say that
> the program has been modified from the original author's version. That
> requirement is only on the modified files themselves, in section 2a.
Well, the modified version would have to have a copyright notice
appropriate for it, not for the original, and would therefore list the
modifier as well as the original authors. Maybe not be as clear a
declaration as he would like, but it's something.
paul
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, (continued)
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Tim Smith, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Chris Jefferson, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Paul Jarc, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Barry Margolin, 2004/06/29
- Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code,
Paul Jarc <=
Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/06/29