Re: The worst that can happen to GPLed code

[Alexander Terekhov]

Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
[...]
> Not really, as his doing so would imply a copy,
> but he could comply with the GPL and put up the
> source as well. This would allow you to argue that
> you have a lawfull copy of the object file, and
> apply first sale to it. 

I'll take it that you agree that dynamic linking and distribution 
of GPLed libraries together with non-GPLed stuff is OK. You only
object the static linking. Right?

regards,
alexander.