Re: SCO laying an ambush for the GPL?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 18:23 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> [...]
> > See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> 
> Your "maxi-me" (edition 2004) doesn't like PDFs as well. See
> <http://www.spinics.net/lists/xf/msg02327.html>.
> 
> <quote source=http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
> 
> If you send me the plain text, HTML, or PDF, then I could read it.
> 
> </quote>
> 
> Liar.

I'm a serious believer you have a problem with english.
He said his <<method of accessing the web through email and wget does
not work for binary files>>. It might have been true, and there's no
reason for you to call him a liar based on that.

If the pdf was sent as an attachment, maybe he could save it and see it.

I think I shall quote that Stallman post you linked as it clearly
defines what you just wrote:

<<I suspect that if one were to study all the statements carefully we
would find that you're trying to put something valid in a bad light.>>

This fits you as such a glove, Alexander...

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part