[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patents again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Patents again |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:58:12 +0200 |
John Hasler wrote:
[...]
> File the patent and ignore it after it issues. It will be marked abandoned
> when you don't pay your fees but it will be in the USPTO database and will
> constitute prior art even by USPTO standards.
You don't need a patent for that. Disclosures aside for a moment,
SIR (Statutory Invention Registration) is good enough, so to say.
See also:
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200401/msg01114.html
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Patents again, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, Abdullah Ramazanoglu, 2004/10/15
- Re: Patents again, threeseas, 2004/10/19
Re: Patents again, Paul Barker, 2004/10/17