[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and inhouse use?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and inhouse use? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 12:45:53 +0200 (CEST) |
> > As I said to David, I was talking about code that offers a
> > service to the public.
>
> So every Web site, every shell provider, every search engine
> running any GPL software would have to distribute source to
> every user.
>
> Every user who has access to the Program, yes. This is all
> perfecly reasonable.
In your opinion, which differs quite from that of the FSF and
pretty much everybody else.
I was answering a specific concern `code that offers a service to the
public'. Please David, learn to read instead of resorting to
Terkhovian methods.
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, (continued)
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, John Hasler, 2006/05/16
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/17
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
- Re: GPL and inhouse use?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/18