[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wallace's reply brief
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Wallace's reply brief |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:43:59 +0100 |
A small correction...
Qua, 2006-08-02 às 09:32 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra escreveu:
> Qua, 2006-08-02 às 09:41 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > (consider that over time, under "bazaar model" with long chain of
> > derivation in derivative works and additions to collective works by
> > different authors, GPL'd IP becomes practically locked within the GPL
> > pool)
>
> Funny. Correcting "IP" with Copyrights you're describing precisely the
> intent:
>
> GPL'd Copyrights are designed to remain GPL'd Copyrights within the GPL
> pool. I'm not sure I would use the word "lock" though, since they're
> available to anyone who comes and plays within the rules of the game,
> that is to keep feeding the pool.
... if and only if you distribute the work or a modified version.
> You don't like the terms for including the work, then don't include it.
> Write your own stuff.
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
- Wallace's reply brief (was: IBM's appellee brief in Wallace case), Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/01
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/01
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/01
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/01
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, John Hasler, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, David Kastrup, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/02
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/03
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Ferd Burfel, 2006/08/03
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, John Hasler, 2006/08/03
- Re: Wallace's reply brief, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/04