gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: license question with non-GPL library


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: license question with non-GPL library
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:03:23 +0200

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> GPL because the work as a whole has to be licensed under the GPL,
> >
> > Man oh man. Go back to doctor, retard. Try another one.
> >
> > http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
> 
> And another long quote contradicting Alexander.  Cute.  Again, dearest
> Alexander, like what you quoted tells you, the question is what
> _whole_ work can be considered a derivative of the GPLed work.  

And "what _whole_ work can be considered a derivative of the GPLed 
work", retard? Go to doctor and tell him that GNU folklore legends 
of A+B and "non-standardized" interfaces causing works to be 
considered a derivative of the GPLed work in the GNU Republic.

regards,
alexander.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]