Re: Combining GPL and commercial license

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was
> supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived
> from (among others) the GPLed piece.

His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot.

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040207022922296

SCO:

30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred 
to as UNIX “flavors.” All commercial UNIX “flavors” in use today are 
modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V 
Technology (“System V Technology”).

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004040118450269

IBM:

30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and 
Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps, 
manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx".

regards,
alexander.