[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- ACT: Perens Invokes the Nuh Uh! Defense
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- ACT: Perens Invokes the Nuh Uh! Defense, Calls Us Names |
Date: |
11 Apr 2007 10:38:44 GMT |
In article <461CABF8.6FFDA205@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>GPLv3 may be interpreted as FSF tortiously interfering with a legal
>contract between two parties concerning intellectual property issues
>between them. Mr. Perens cites to the case of Daniel Wallace which
>was based on a predatory pricing theory under another version of the
>GPL and not a group boycott theory as I was suggesting in respect of
>the GPLv3.
So what's the theory? That you can be sued for urging a "group
boycott"? Welcome to the wacky world of American law. How *dare*
you oppose the large corporations!
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- "additional permissions" [lgpl3-dd2], Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/03
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- ACT's reaction, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/07
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- ACT: Perens Invokes the Nuh Uh! Defense, Calls Us Names, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/11
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- ACT: Perens Invokes the Nuh Uh! Defense, Calls Us Names,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- DeLong: "TOP 10 REASONS WHY SOFTWARE ENGINEERS SHOULD BE WARY OF GPLv3", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/21
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- DeLong: "TOP 10 REASONS WHY SOFTWARE ENGINEERS SHOULD BE WARY OF GPLv3", penguin, 2007/04/23
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Healy: "FSF betrays its followers with GPL v3", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/24
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Eben's "Life After GPLv3", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/25
- Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Laurie: "Moglen Celebrates the Increase in the Chocolate Ration", Alexander Terekhov, 2007/04/26