|
From: | rjack |
Subject: | Re: GPLv3 comedy unfolding -- Eben Moglen predicts broad embrace of GPL 3 |
Date: | Sat, 26 May 2007 14:07:52 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) |
John Hasler wrote:
David Kastrup writes:An "illegal document"? Well, I've heard quite a few weird attacks on the GPL, but this is the first time I see someone suspecting it to be pornography or similar.Well, the doofuses at SCO claimed GPLv2 was "unconstitutional". The phrase "illegal document" doesn't make a whole lot of sense, though, at least under US law.
A document (instrument) is illegal if it is used for some some purpose contrary to established law.
For example a document to consummate a violation of law: 1. illegal immigration documents 2. counterfit bonds or false ID's 3. contract to perpetrate or induce a tort (GPL3) rjack
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |