[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Right to copy source code

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Right to copy source code
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:20:05 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup wrote:
>> Alexander Terekhov <address@hidden> writes:
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> > Your "program" is merely an aggregation ("collective work" at most
>> >> > if selection is creative enough) of multiple computer program works.
>> >>
>> >> "copy the source code that I need to my project and compile it"...
>> >> Sorry, but that's not even borderline contentious: of course this
>> >> constitutes creation of a derived work, not an aggregation.
>> >
>> > Only in the GNU Republic. That's because in the GNU Republic,
>> > linking creates a "derived work"
>> He did not talk about linking.
>> > (in short, compilers and linkers don't create derivative works).
>> In this case, he was talking about creating the derivative work
>> himself by copying material into his code.
>> Your reading comprehension sometimes really falls short of the mark.
> Static linking is the same as copy'n'paste/#include and then compile 
> as one compilation unit. Both means result in an aggregation in the 
> same unit on storage akin to compress, lib, or *zip (runtime binding
> in the same address space aside for a moment). I enjoy you playing 
> an utter cretin, dak.

Actually, pretty much every judge on this planet plays cretin in the
same manner, so there is lots of enjoyment in stock for happy fun

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]