|
| From: | Ciaran O'Riordan |
| Subject: | Re: EU anti-trust case, FSFE, Samba |
| Date: | 21 Sep 2007 11:30:31 +0100 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes: > reasonable and non-discriminatory != royalty free, to begin with. It does when they have to not discriminate against Samba. ...but I do have to make one clarification. If Microsoft wanted a once-off payment for access to the specs, that could be ok so long as the amount is "reasonable". That wouldn't exclude Samba or other free software. -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3 http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ GPLv3 and other work supported by http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |