[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:57:50 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Dec 5, 4:45 pm, "Noah Slater" <nsla...@bytesexual.org> wrote:
> On 05/12/2007, mike3 <mike4...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > But you seemed to imply the more "technically correct"
> > name should be used.
>
> Nope. If you want to call it Ubuntu, fine. If you want to describe the
> operating system type or give it a full name you should use the
> technically correct version.
>
Which of course is "GNU/Linux". Alright.
> > "When we ask people to say "GNU/Linux", we are not dividing people.
> > ***We are asking them to give the GNU Project credit for the GNU
> > operating system.*** This does not criticize anyone or push anyone
> > away. "
> > (emphasis mine)
>
> I stand corrected. I actually think this is the wrong approach.
>
Really? Hmm.
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/05
Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/06
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/06
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/06
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/06
Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07
Message not availableRe: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/07