[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Noah Slater |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:50:48 +0000 |
On 07/12/2007, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Uh no. POSIX does not lay out what it means to be a "type of operating
> system". It lays out what _interfaces_ must be there for certain
> degrees of POSIX compliancy. It does not require the embodiment of
> those interfaces to run under the name "operating system".
I consider that to be a good enough definition of "operating system"
--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/05
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/06
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Noah Slater <=
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Brian, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07