[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:04:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why don't you post the final order (or link to it) resulting in closure
of that case?
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/DISMISSAL.pdf
The source code for the GPLed software in question
is available here: <http://opensource.actiontec.com/>
Whether or not Verizon is violating technical details
of the GPL, the source code for the router software
is available from the router's manufacturer.
Do you know of any instances where the SFLC has dropped
a case and the source code continued to be unavailable?
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/13
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/13
- Re: Attorney fees, John Hasler, 2008/07/13
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, John Hasler, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15