gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?


From: amicus_curious
Subject: Re: Is the GPL all encompassing?
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 20:17:33 -0400


"Rjack" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
amicus_curious wrote:

"Rjack" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
Assume I have the source code for the Linux 2.6 kernel.
Suppose I want to use just a piece of it. How small a piece
does it have to be before I'm no longer violating the GPL?

So do you want to "steal" this code and go into business armed
only with a clone of a clone?

So do you want to "steal" code to achieve your socialist dreams?
GPL authors obviously want to "steal" other author's exclusive
rights by intimidation [n.1] with a copyright license that is
clearly an illegal misuse of copyright.

I think that you misread my comment. My belief is that the GPL is totally unnecessary because what it seeks to prevent isn't a viable outcome to beging with. I put the word "steal" in comments with the expectation that it meant that I did not consider it to be theft to begin with.

I find it incredible that after listening to seven years of pure
legal gibberish from Eben "a license is not a contract" Moglen, you
still spout crap such as: "So do you want to "steal" this code. .
.". It seems that your ignorance of the law is exceeded only by your
gullibility:

Well, I admit to having a lot of ignorance of the law and frequent these forums to improve on that score. One of the premises of copyright is that you only copyright the expression of the idea and not the idea itself. If the idea cannot be protected by patent, anyone is free to clone the idea. Your original question was in regard to how much of a copy can be considered legitimate. I think that, given the fairly restrictive range of computer code's ability to express the idea, there is not much beyond a 100% verbatim copy that would qualify as copyright infringement. If you have the source, you have the essential idea only and the nature of the developer is to put his own mark on the code anyway, so any such code will be massaged into a quite different expression from the original. That is where all the fun is and it is unlikely that anyone but a true drudge would verbatim copy source code.

"Although the United States Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.  101-
1332, grants exclusive jurisdiction for infringement claims to the
federal courts, those courts construe copyrights as contracts and
turn to the relevant state law to interpret them."; Automation by
Design, Inc. v. Raybestos Products Co., 463 F.3d 749, (United
States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 2006).

Tell that to the RIAA.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]